Paracentesis for cancer-related ascites in palliative care: An international, prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Paracentesis is commonly undertaken in patients with cancer-related ascites. AIM: To systematically investigate the symptomatic benefits and harms experienced by patients with cancer undergoing paracentesis using real-world data in the palliative care setting. DESIGN: Prospective, multisite, observational, consecutive cohort study. Benefits and harms of paracentesis were assessed between 01/07/2018 and 31/02/2021 as part of routine clinical assessments by treating clinicians at four timepoints: (T0) before paracentesis; (T1) once drainage ceased; (T2) 24 h after T1 and (T3) 28 days after T1 or next paracentesis, if sooner. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from 11 participating sites across five countries (Australia, England, Hong Kong, Malaysia and New Zealand) on 111 patients undergoing paracentesis via a temporary (73%) or indwelling (21%) catheter: 51% male, median age 69 years, Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Score 50. RESULTS: At T1 (n = 100), symptoms had improved for most patients (81%), specifically abdominal distension (61%), abdominal pain (49%) and nausea (27%), with two-thirds experiencing improvement in ⩾2 symptoms. In the remaining patients, symptoms were unchanged (7%) or worse (12%). At least one harm occurred in 32% of patients, the most common being an ascitic leak (n = 14). By T3, 89% of patients had experienced some benefit and 36% some harm, including four patients who experienced serious harm, one of which was a fatal bowel perforation. CONCLUSION: Most patients obtained rapid benefits from paracentesis. Harms were less frequent and generally mild, but occasionally serious and fatal. Our findings help inform clinician-patient discussions about the potential outcomes of paracentesis in this frail population.

Informational needs and the quality of life of patients in their first year after metastatic breast cancer diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the informational needs and quality of life (QOL) of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) within the first year of their diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: To describe the informational needs and QOL of patients with MBC within the first year of diagnosis, and to identify sociodemographic and medical factors that may be associated with informational needs and QOL. METHODS: 52 patients (50 women, 2 men) enrolled within a year of diagnosis of MBC completed a cross-sectional, self-administered paper survey that included patient demographics, the Toronto Informational Needs Questionnaire-Breast Cancer (TINQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). High informational need was defined as a TINQ score of ≥ 200. RESULTS: Of the total 52 patients, 69% (35/52) had high informational needs, 20% met the criteria for anxiety (HADS-Anxiety score, ≥ 11), and 8% met the criteria for depression. SF-36 scores were lower in all 8 subscales compared with the general population. Multivariate analyses showed that patients who were married or living as married (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4-28.9) and patients with de novo MBC (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.5-14.3) or a shorter disease-free interval (DFI; < 5 years; OR, 24.2; 95% CI, 3.1-187.4) were more likely to have more informational needs (C statistic, 0.824) than were patients with a longer DFI (≥ 5 years). LIMITATIONS: This is a small cross-sectional study of a single academic institution. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recently diagnosed MBC have high informational needs and decreased overall QOL. Additional research and supportive services meeting the informational and psychosocial needs of patients living with MBC are warranted.